SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 876900 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Visual correspondence-based explanations improve AI robustness and human-AI team accuracyCode1
Improving Adversarial Robustness via Mutual Information EstimationCode1
Decoupled Adversarial Contrastive Learning for Self-supervised Adversarial RobustnessCode1
Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning Leads to Higher Adversarial Susceptibility0
Do Perceptually Aligned Gradients Imply Adversarial Robustness?Code0
AugRmixAT: A Data Processing and Training Method for Improving Multiple Robustness and Generalization Performance0
One-vs-the-Rest Loss to Focus on Important Samples in Adversarial Training0
Careful What You Wish For: on the Extraction of Adversarially Trained ModelsCode0
Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks0
Tailoring Self-Supervision for Supervised LearningCode1
Assaying Out-Of-Distribution Generalization in Transfer LearningCode0
Adversarial Contrastive Learning via Asymmetric InfoNCECode1
Automated Repair of Neural NetworksCode0
CARBEN: Composite Adversarial Robustness BenchmarkCode1
Distance Learner: Incorporating Manifold Prior to Model TrainingCode1
Adversarially-Aware Robust Object DetectorCode1
Bi-fidelity Evolutionary Multiobjective Search for Adversarially Robust Deep Neural Architectures0
Exploring Adversarial Examples and Adversarial Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks by Mutual InformationCode0
Certified Adversarial Robustness via Anisotropic Randomized Smoothing0
Adversarial Robustness Assessment of NeuroEvolution Approaches0
RUSH: Robust Contrastive Learning via Randomized Smoothing0
Dynamic Time Warping based Adversarial Framework for Time-Series DomainCode0
How many perturbations break this model? Evaluating robustness beyond adversarial accuracyCode0
On the Relationship Between Adversarial Robustness and Decision Region in Deep Neural Network0
Adversarial Robustness of Visual Dialog0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 36 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified