SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 826850 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Pruning Adversarially Robust Neural Networks without Adversarial ExamplesCode1
Symmetry Defense Against CNN Adversarial Perturbation Attacks0
Towards Out-of-Distribution Adversarial RobustnessCode0
On Adversarial Robustness of Deep Image Deblurring0
Strength-Adaptive Adversarial Training0
Push-Pull: Characterizing the Adversarial Robustness for Audio-Visual Active Speaker Detection0
Adaptive Smoothness-weighted Adversarial Training for Multiple Perturbations with Its Stability AnalysisCode0
Understanding Adversarial Robustness Against On-manifold Adversarial ExamplesCode0
On the tightness of linear relaxation based robustness certification methods0
Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight DecayCode0
Adversarial Robustness of Representation Learning for Knowledge GraphsCode1
Generalizability of Adversarial Robustness Under Distribution Shifts0
Inducing Data Amplification Using Auxiliary Datasets in Adversarial TrainingCode0
Fair Robust Active Learning by Joint Inconsistency0
Audit and Improve Robustness of Private Neural Networks on Encrypted Data0
AdvDO: Realistic Adversarial Attacks for Trajectory Prediction0
Characterizing Internal Evasion Attacks in Federated LearningCode1
Towards Bridging the Performance Gaps of Joint Energy-based ModelsCode0
Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional Robustness0
Part-Based Models Improve Adversarial RobustnessCode1
A Light Recipe to Train Robust Vision TransformersCode1
On the interplay of adversarial robustness and architecture components: patches, convolution and attention0
Correlation Information Bottleneck: Towards Adapting Pretrained Multimodal Models for Robust Visual Question Answering0
PointACL:Adversarial Contrastive Learning for Robust Point Clouds Representation under Adversarial AttackCode0
Robust Transferable Feature Extractors: Learning to Defend Pre-Trained Networks Against White Box Adversaries0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 34 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified