SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 801825 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
A Comparative Analysis of Adversarial Robustness for Quantum and Classical Machine Learning Models0
Curvature Dynamic Black-box Attack: revisiting adversarial robustness via dynamic curvature estimation0
A More Biologically Plausible Local Learning Rule for ANNs0
CSTAR: Towards Compact and STructured Deep Neural Networks with Adversarial Robustness0
Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applications0
A margin-based replacement for cross-entropy loss0
Cross Domain Generative Augmentation: Domain Generalization with Latent Diffusion Models0
Criticality Leveraged Adversarial Training (CLAT) for Boosted Performance via Parameter Efficiency0
Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning0
ALMA: Aggregated Lipschitz Maximization Attack on Auto-encoders0
Contextual Fusion For Adversarial Robustness0
Constraining Logits by Bounded Function for Adversarial Robustness0
Constrained Learning with Non-Convex Losses0
Constrained Adaptive Attacks: Realistic Evaluation of Adversarial Examples and Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks for Tabular Data0
Algorithmic Bias and Data Bias: Understanding the Relation between Distributionally Robust Optimization and Data Curation0
aiXamine: Simplified LLM Safety and Security0
AI-Compass: A Comprehensive and Effective Multi-module Testing Tool for AI Systems0
Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attacks0
Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Speech Recognition Systems0
CARES: Comprehensive Evaluation of Safety and Adversarial Robustness in Medical LLMs0
Confronting the Reproducibility Crisis: A Case Study of Challenges in Cybersecurity AI0
Conflict-Aware Adversarial Training0
A Hybrid Defense Strategy for Boosting Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models0
A Holistic Assessment of the Reliability of Machine Learning Systems0
A High Dimensional Statistical Model for Adversarial Training: Geometry and Trade-Offs0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 33 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified