SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 5175 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Adversarial Robustness for CodeCode1
Adversarial Robustness Comparison of Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer to CNNsCode1
Adversarial Machine Learning: Bayesian PerspectivesCode1
Achieving robustness in classification using optimal transport with hinge regularizationCode1
GenoArmory: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Adversarial Attacks on Genomic Foundation ModelsCode1
Adversarial Robustness in Graph Neural Networks: A Hamiltonian ApproachCode1
Adversarial Vulnerability of Randomized EnsemblesCode1
Adversarial Attack and Defense Strategies for Deep Speaker Recognition SystemsCode1
Adversarial Attack on Deep Learning-Based Splice LocalizationCode1
Adversarial Robustness of Bottleneck Injected Deep Neural Networks for Task-Oriented CommunicationCode1
Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment StudiesCode1
Adversarial Attacks on Graph Classification via Bayesian OptimisationCode1
Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust GeneralizationCode1
AdvRush: Searching for Adversarially Robust Neural ArchitecturesCode1
A Light Recipe to Train Robust Vision TransformersCode1
Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language ModelsCode1
Adversarially-Aware Robust Object DetectorCode1
Adversarial Robustness under Long-Tailed DistributionCode1
CausalAdv: Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of CausalityCode1
Adversarial Robustness via Random Projection FiltersCode1
Adversarial Contrastive Learning via Asymmetric InfoNCECode1
Adversarial Training with Complementary Labels: On the Benefit of Gradually Informative AttacksCode1
Adversarial Visual Robustness by Causal InterventionCode1
Adversarial vulnerability of powerful near out-of-distribution detectionCode1
Adversarial Attacks on ML Defense Models CompetitionCode1
Show:102550
← PrevPage 3 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified