SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 651675 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
WEDGE: A multi-weather autonomous driving dataset built from generative vision-language modelsCode1
Randomized Smoothing with Masked Inference for Adversarially Robust Text ClassificationsCode0
Inter-frame Accelerate Attack against Video Interpolation Models0
Investigating the Corruption Robustness of Image Classifiers with Random Lp-norm CorruptionsCode0
Sharpness-Aware Minimization Alone can Improve Adversarial RobustnessCode1
Stratified Adversarial Robustness with RejectionCode0
Attack-SAM: Towards Attacking Segment Anything Model With Adversarial Examples0
Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learning0
Lyapunov-Stable Deep Equilibrium Models0
Improving Robustness Against Adversarial Attacks with Deeply Quantized Neural Networks0
Test-Time Adaptation with Perturbation Consistency Learning0
Robust Tickets Can Transfer Better: Drawing More Transferable Subnetworks in Transfer Learning0
Evaluating Adversarial Robustness on Document Image Classification0
Robust and differentially private stochastic linear bandits0
Individual Fairness in Bayesian Neural NetworksCode0
Using Z3 for Formal Modeling and Verification of FNN Global RobustnessCode0
Certified Adversarial Robustness Within Multiple Perturbation BoundsCode0
Wavelets Beat Monkeys at Adversarial Robustness0
GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative ModelsCode0
Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applications0
Benchmarking the Physical-world Adversarial Robustness of Vehicle Detection0
Hyper-parameter Tuning for Adversarially Robust ModelsCode0
CGDTest: A Constrained Gradient Descent Algorithm for Testing Neural Networks0
Towards Adversarially Robust Continual Learning0
Generating Adversarial Samples in Mini-Batches May Be Detrimental To Adversarial RobustnessCode0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 27 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified