SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 576600 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Homophily-Driven Sanitation View for Robust Graph Contrastive Learning0
HybridAugment++: Unified Frequency Spectra Perturbations for Model RobustnessCode1
A Holistic Assessment of the Reliability of Machine Learning Systems0
Omnipotent Adversarial Training in the WildCode0
Mitigating Adversarial Vulnerability through Causal Parameter Estimation by Adversarial Double Machine LearningCode1
Min-Max Optimization under Delays0
Function-Space Regularization for Deep Bayesian Classification0
Enhancing Adversarial Robustness via Score-Based OptimizationCode1
A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithms0
A Theoretical Perspective on Subnetwork Contributions to Adversarial Robustness0
Transgressing the boundaries: towards a rigorous understanding of deep learning and its (non-)robustness0
Kernels, Data & Physics0
On the Adversarial Robustness of Generative Autoencoders in the Latent Space0
The Importance of Robust Features in Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting0
Mitigating Accuracy-Robustness Trade-off via Balanced Multi-Teacher Adversarial DistillationCode1
A Survey on Out-of-Distribution Evaluation of Neural NLP Models0
Advancing Adversarial Training by Injecting Booster Signal0
Robust Proxy: Improving Adversarial Robustness by Robust Proxy Learning0
Computational Asymmetries in Robust ClassificationCode0
Robust Spatiotemporal Traffic Forecasting with Reinforced Dynamic Adversarial TrainingCode1
A Spectral Perspective towards Understanding and Improving Adversarial Robustness0
On Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models0
Enhancing Adversarial Training via Reweighting Optimization TrajectoryCode0
Similarity Preserving Adversarial Graph Contrastive LearningCode1
Adversarial Robustness Certification for Bayesian Neural NetworksCode0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 24 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified