SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About Blog

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 1721–1730 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Distilled Agent DQN for Provable Adversarial Robustness	Sep 27, 2018	Adversarial Robustnessreinforcement-learning	—Unverified	0
Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noise	Sep 10, 2018	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Training for Faster Adversarial Robustness Verification via Inducing ReLU Stability	Sep 9, 2018	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Lipschitz regularized Deep Neural Networks generalize and are adversarially robust	Aug 28, 2018	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
Implicit Generative Modeling of Random Noise during Training for Adversarial Robustness	Jul 5, 2018	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
An Explainable Adversarial Robustness Metric for Deep Learning Neural Networks	Jun 5, 2018	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
AutoZOOM: Autoencoder-based Zeroth Order Optimization Method for Attacking Black-box Neural Networks	May 30, 2018	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
GenAttack: Practical Black-box Attacks with Gradient-Free Optimization	May 28, 2018	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNIST	May 23, 2018	Adversarial RobustnessBinarization	CodeCode Available	0
Deep Defense: Training DNNs with Improved Adversarial Robustness	Feb 23, 2018	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 173 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified