SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About Blog

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 1581–1590 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
MadNet: Using a MAD Optimization for Defending Against Adversarial Attacks	Nov 3, 2019	Adversarial DefenseAdversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
Preventing Gradient Attenuation in Lipschitz Constrained Convolutional Networks	Nov 3, 2019	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Fault Tolerance of Neural Networks in Adversarial Settings	Oct 30, 2019	Adversarial RobustnessFairness	—Unverified	0
Distribution Density, Tails, and Outliers in Machine Learning: Metrics and Applications	Oct 29, 2019	Adversarial RobustnessBIG-bench Machine Learning	—Unverified	0
Certified Adversarial Robustness for Deep Reinforcement Learning	Oct 28, 2019	Adversarial RobustnessCollision Avoidance	—Unverified	0
Label Smoothing and Logit Squeezing: A Replacement for Adversarial Training?	Oct 25, 2019	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
A Useful Taxonomy for Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks	Oct 23, 2019	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
Are Perceptually-Aligned Gradients a General Property of Robust Classifiers?	Oct 18, 2019	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
An empirical study of pretrained representations for few-shot classification	Oct 3, 2019	Adversarial RobustnessClassification	—Unverified	0
Adversarial Robustness vs. Model Compression, or Both?	Oct 1, 2019	Adversarial Robustnessmodel	CodeCode Available	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 159 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified