SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About Blog

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 1401–1410 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Buffer Zone based Defense against Adversarial Examples in Image Classification	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessClassification	—Unverified	0
What are effective labels for augmented data? Improving robustness with AutoLabel	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessData Augmentation	—Unverified	0
Perturbation Type Categorization for Multiple _p Bounded Adversarial Robustness	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessVocal Bursts Type Prediction	—Unverified	0
Disentangling Adversarial Robustness in Directions of the Data Manifold	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Intriguing class-wise properties of adversarial training	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
No Feature Is An Island: Adaptive Collaborations Between Features Improve Adversarial Robustness	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial Robustnesscounterfactual	—Unverified	0
Test-Time Adaptation and Adversarial Robustness	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessDomain Adaptation	—Unverified	0
Collective Robustness Certificates	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessImage Segmentation	—Unverified	0
Improving Adversarial Robustness in Weight-quantized Neural Networks	Dec 29, 2020	Adversarial RobustnessQuantization	—Unverified	0
A Simple Fine-tuning Is All You Need: Towards Robust Deep Learning Via Adversarial Fine-tuning	Dec 25, 2020	Adversarial RobustnessAll	—Unverified	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 141 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified