SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 131–140 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype	Score
Adversarial Robustness Comparison of Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer to CNNs	Oct 6, 2021	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Robustness in Graph Neural Networks: A Hamiltonian Approach	Oct 10, 2023	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Stronger	Feb 26, 2020	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
A Unified Analysis of Mixed Sample Data Augmentation: A Loss Function Perspective	Aug 21, 2022	Adversarial RobustnessData Augmentation	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuning	Mar 28, 2020	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Robustness as a Prior for Learned Representations	Jun 3, 2019	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Robustness of Deep Convolutional Candlestick Learner	May 29, 2020	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Robustness of Bottleneck Injected Deep Neural Networks for Task-Oriented Communication	Dec 13, 2024	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness	Mar 20, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessMalware Detection	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Attacks on Graph Classifiers via Bayesian Optimisation	Dec 1, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessBayesian Optimisation	CodeCode Available	1	5

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 14 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified