SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 1341–1350 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Towards Understanding Adversarial Robustness of Optical Flow Networks	Mar 30, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessOptical Flow Estimation	CodeCode Available	0
Ensemble-in-One: Learning Ensemble within Random Gated Networks for Enhanced Adversarial Robustness	Mar 27, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
Constant Random Perturbations Provide Adversarial Robustness with Minimal Effect on Accuracy	Mar 15, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Reframing Neural Networks: Deep Structure in Overcomplete Representations	Mar 10, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessModel Selection	—Unverified	0
Improving Global Adversarial Robustness Generalization With Adversarially Trained GAN	Mar 8, 2021	Adversarial DefenseAdversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
Constrained Learning with Non-Convex Losses	Mar 8, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessFairness	—Unverified	0
Improving Transformation-based Defenses against Adversarial Examples with First-order Perturbations	Mar 8, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
Structure-Preserving Progressive Low-rank Image Completion for Defending Adversarial Attacks	Mar 4, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessLow-Rank Matrix Completion	—Unverified	0
Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial Robustness	Mar 3, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Smoothness Analysis of Adversarial Training	Mar 2, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 135 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified