SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 276300 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
HybridAugment++: Unified Frequency Spectra Perturbations for Model RobustnessCode1
A Unified Game-Theoretic Interpretation of Adversarial RobustnessCode1
A Perturbation-Constrained Adversarial Attack for Evaluating the Robustness of Optical FlowCode1
A Pilot Study of Query-Free Adversarial Attack against Stable DiffusionCode1
BadPart: Unified Black-box Adversarial Patch Attacks against Pixel-wise Regression TasksCode1
Hold me tight! Influence of discriminative features on deep network boundariesCode1
Holistic Deep LearningCode1
Bag of Tricks for Adversarial TrainingCode1
Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness on Image ClassificationCode1
ARAE: Adversarially Robust Training of Autoencoders Improves Novelty DetectionCode1
How Robust is Google's Bard to Adversarial Image Attacks?Code1
Mitigating Adversarial Vulnerability through Causal Parameter Estimation by Adversarial Double Machine LearningCode1
Better Robustness by More Coverage: Adversarial Training with Mixup Augmentation for Robust Fine-tuningCode1
Adversarial Contrastive Learning via Asymmetric InfoNCECode1
HypMix: Hyperbolic Interpolative Data AugmentationCode1
Improve robustness of DNN for ECG signal classification:a noise-to-signal ratio perspectiveCode1
Improving Adversarial Robustness by Enforcing Local and Global CompactnessCode1
A Regularization Method to Improve Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks for ECG Signal ClassificationCode1
Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesCode1
Improving Adversarial Robustness via Mutual Information EstimationCode1
Certifiably Adversarially Robust Detection of Out-of-Distribution DataCode1
Adversarial Robustness in Graph Neural Networks: A Hamiltonian ApproachCode1
Are socially-aware trajectory prediction models really socially-aware?Code1
Improving the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off of Classifiers via Adaptive SmoothingCode1
Towards Physically Realizable Adversarial Attacks in Embodied Vision NavigationCode1
Show:102550
← PrevPage 12 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified