SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 1031–1040 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recourse	Dec 21, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessDecision Making	CodeCode Available	0
Improving Robustness with Image Filtering	Dec 21, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessData Augmentation	—Unverified	0
Certified Federated Adversarial Training	Dec 20, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessFederated Learning	—Unverified	0
Analyzing and Improving the Robustness of Tabular Classifiers using Counterfactual Explanations	Dec 13, 2021	Adversarial Robustnesscounterfactual	CodeCode Available	0
The King is Naked: on the Notion of Robustness for Natural Language Processing	Dec 13, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Spatial-Temporal-Fusion BNN: Variational Bayesian Feature Layer	Dec 12, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessUncertainty Quantification	—Unverified	0
On Adversarial Robustness of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation	Dec 11, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessAutonomous Driving	CodeCode Available	0
Robustness Certificates for Implicit Neural Networks: A Mixed Monotone Contractive Approach	Dec 10, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
PixMix: Dreamlike Pictures Comprehensively Improve Safety Measures	Dec 9, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessAnomaly Detection	CodeCode Available	1
Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detection	Dec 8, 2021	Adversarial Attack DetectionAdversarial Defense	CodeCode Available	1

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 104 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified