The Lyme Disease Controversy: An AI-Driven Discourse Analysis of a Quarter Century of Academic Debate and Divides
Teo Susnjak, Cole Palffy, Tatiana Zimina, Nazgul Altynbekova, Kunal Garg, Leona Gilbert
Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.
ReproduceCode
- github.com/teosusnjak/Lyme-disease-controversyOfficialnone★ 0
Abstract
The scientific discourse surrounding Chronic Lyme Disease (CLD) and Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) has evolved over the past twenty-five years into a complex and polarised debate, shaped by shifting research priorities, institutional influences, and competing explanatory models. This study presents the first large-scale, systematic examination of this discourse using an innovative hybrid AI-driven methodology, combining large language models with structured human validation to analyse thousands of scholarly abstracts spanning 25 years. By integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with expert oversight, we developed a quantitative framework for tracking epistemic shifts in contested medical fields, with applications to other content analysis domains. Our analysis revealed a progressive transition from infection-based models of Lyme disease to immune-mediated explanations for persistent symptoms. This study offers new empirical insights into the structural and epistemic forces shaping Lyme disease research, providing a scalable and replicable methodology for analysing discourse, while underscoring the value of AI-assisted methodologies in social science and medical research.