SOTAVerified

Sampling Bias in Deep Active Classification: An Empirical Study

2019-09-20IJCNLP 2019Code Available0· sign in to hype

Ameya Prabhu, Charles Dognin, Maneesh Singh

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

The exploding cost and time needed for data labeling and model training are bottlenecks for training DNN models on large datasets. Identifying smaller representative data samples with strategies like active learning can help mitigate such bottlenecks. Previous works on active learning in NLP identify the problem of sampling bias in the samples acquired by uncertainty-based querying and develop costly approaches to address it. Using a large empirical study, we demonstrate that active set selection using the posterior entropy of deep models like FastText.zip (FTZ) is robust to sampling biases and to various algorithmic choices (query size and strategies) unlike that suggested by traditional literature. We also show that FTZ based query strategy produces sample sets similar to those from more sophisticated approaches (e.g ensemble networks). Finally, we show the effectiveness of the selected samples by creating tiny high-quality datasets, and utilizing them for fast and cheap training of large models. Based on the above, we propose a simple baseline for deep active text classification that outperforms the state-of-the-art. We expect the presented work to be useful and informative for dataset compression and for problems involving active, semi-supervised or online learning scenarios. Code and models are available at: https://github.com/drimpossible/Sampling-Bias-Active-Learning

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
AG NewsULMFiT (Small data)Error6.3Unverified
Amazon-2ULMFiT (Small data)Error3.9Unverified
Amazon-5ULMFiT (Small data)Error35.9Unverified
DBpediaULMFiT (Small data)Error0.8Unverified
Sogou NewsULMFiT (Small data)Accuracy97Unverified
Yahoo! AnswersULMFiT (Small data)Accuracy74.3Unverified
Yelp-2ULMFiT (Small data)Accuracy97.1Unverified
Yelp-5ULMFiT (Small data)Accuracy67.6Unverified

Reproductions