SOTAVerified

Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classification

2017-12-13ECCV 2018Code Available0· sign in to hype

Saining Xie, Chen Sun, Jonathan Huang, Zhuowen Tu, Kevin Murphy

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Despite the steady progress in video analysis led by the adoption of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), the relative improvement has been less drastic as that in 2D static image classification. Three main challenges exist including spatial (image) feature representation, temporal information representation, and model/computation complexity. It was recently shown by Carreira and Zisserman that 3D CNNs, inflated from 2D networks and pretrained on ImageNet, could be a promising way for spatial and temporal representation learning. However, as for model/computation complexity, 3D CNNs are much more expensive than 2D CNNs and prone to overfit. We seek a balance between speed and accuracy by building an effective and efficient video classification system through systematic exploration of critical network design choices. In particular, we show that it is possible to replace many of the 3D convolutions by low-cost 2D convolutions. Rather surprisingly, best result (in both speed and accuracy) is achieved when replacing the 3D convolutions at the bottom of the network, suggesting that temporal representation learning on high-level semantic features is more useful. Our conclusion generalizes to datasets with very different properties. When combined with several other cost-effective designs including separable spatial/temporal convolution and feature gating, our system results in an effective video classification system that that produces very competitive results on several action classification benchmarks (Kinetics, Something-something, UCF101 and HMDB), as well as two action detection (localization) benchmarks (JHMDB and UCF101-24).

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
HMDB-51S3D-G (ImageNet, Kinetics-400 pretrained)Average accuracy of 3 splits75.9Unverified
Something-Something V1S3D-G (ImageNet pretrained)Top 1 Accuracy48.2Unverified
Something-Something V1S3DTop 1 Accuracy47.3Unverified
UCF101S3D-G (ImageNet, Kinetics-400 pretrained)3-fold Accuracy96.8Unverified

Reproductions