SOTAVerified

Neural Architecture Transfer

2020-05-12Code Available1· sign in to hype

Zhichao Lu, Gautam Sreekumar, Erik Goodman, Wolfgang Banzhaf, Kalyanmoy Deb, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Neural architecture search (NAS) has emerged as a promising avenue for automatically designing task-specific neural networks. Existing NAS approaches require one complete search for each deployment specification of hardware or objective. This is a computationally impractical endeavor given the potentially large number of application scenarios. In this paper, we propose Neural Architecture Transfer (NAT) to overcome this limitation. NAT is designed to efficiently generate task-specific custom models that are competitive under multiple conflicting objectives. To realize this goal we learn task-specific supernets from which specialized subnets can be sampled without any additional training. The key to our approach is an integrated online transfer learning and many-objective evolutionary search procedure. A pre-trained supernet is iteratively adapted while simultaneously searching for task-specific subnets. We demonstrate the efficacy of NAT on 11 benchmark image classification tasks ranging from large-scale multi-class to small-scale fine-grained datasets. In all cases, including ImageNet, NATNets improve upon the state-of-the-art under mobile settings ( 600M Multiply-Adds). Surprisingly, small-scale fine-grained datasets benefit the most from NAT. At the same time, the architecture search and transfer is orders of magnitude more efficient than existing NAS methods. Overall, the experimental evaluation indicates that, across diverse image classification tasks and computational objectives, NAT is an appreciably more effective alternative to conventional transfer learning of fine-tuning weights of an existing network architecture learned on standard datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/human-analysis/neural-architecture-transfer

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
FGVC-AircraftNAT-M4Accuracy90.8Unverified
FGVC-AircraftNAT-M1Accuracy87Unverified
FGVC-AircraftNAT-M3Accuracy90.1Unverified
FGVC-AircraftNAT-M2Accuracy89Unverified
Food-101NAT-M3Accuracy89Unverified
Food-101NAT-M4Accuracy89.4Unverified
Food-101NAT-M1Accuracy87.4Unverified
Food-101NAT-M2Accuracy88.5Unverified
Oxford 102 FlowersNAT-M2Accuracy97.9Unverified
Oxford 102 FlowersNAT-M4Accuracy98.3Unverified
Oxford 102 FlowersNAT-M3Accuracy98.1Unverified
Oxford-IIIT PetsNAT-M4Accuracy94.3Unverified
Oxford-IIIT PetsNAT-M2Accuracy93.5Unverified
Oxford-IIIT PetsNAT-M3Accuracy94.1Unverified
Stanford CarsNAT-M2Accuracy92.2Unverified
Stanford CarsNAT-M1Accuracy90.9Unverified
Stanford CarsNAT-M4Accuracy92.9Unverified
Stanford CarsNAT-M3Accuracy92.6Unverified

Reproductions