Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classification
Rohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Nicholas Carlini, Benjamin Recht, Ludwig Schmidt
Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.
ReproduceCode
- github.com/modestyachts/imagenet-testbedOfficialpytorch★ 119
Abstract
We study how robust current ImageNet models are to distribution shifts arising from natural variations in datasets. Most research on robustness focuses on synthetic image perturbations (noise, simulated weather artifacts, adversarial examples, etc.), which leaves open how robustness on synthetic distribution shift relates to distribution shift arising in real data. Informed by an evaluation of 204 ImageNet models in 213 different test conditions, we find that there is often little to no transfer of robustness from current synthetic to natural distribution shift. Moreover, most current techniques provide no robustness to the natural distribution shifts in our testbed. The main exception is training on larger and more diverse datasets, which in multiple cases increases robustness, but is still far from closing the performance gaps. Our results indicate that distribution shifts arising in real data are currently an open research problem. We provide our testbed and data as a resource for future work at https://modestyachts.github.io/imagenet-testbed/ .
Tasks
Benchmark Results
| Dataset | Model | Metric | Claimed | Verified | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C) | Accuracy - All Images | 38.8 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_brightness) | Accuracy - All Images | 38.8 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_spatter) | Accuracy - All Images | 38.3 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_saturate) | Accuracy - All Images | 38.2 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_pixelate) | Accuracy - All Images | 37.4 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_contrast) | Accuracy - All Images | 36.5 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_jpeg_compression) | Accuracy - All Images | 36.5 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_gaussian_noise) | Accuracy - All Images | 36.4 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_frost) | Accuracy - All Images | 36.1 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_fog_aws) | Accuracy - All Images | 35.9 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_motion_blur) | Accuracy - All Images | 35.7 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_zoom_blur) | Accuracy - All Images | 32.7 | — | Unverified |
| VizWiz-Classification | ResNet-50 (IN-C_greyscale) | Accuracy - All Images | 30.2 | — | Unverified |