SOTAVerified

Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset

2021-03-05Code Available2· sign in to hype

Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, Akul Arora, Steven Basart, Eric Tang, Dawn Song, Jacob Steinhardt

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations. To facilitate future research and increase accuracy on MATH, we also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models the fundamentals of mathematics. Even though we are able to increase accuracy on MATH, our results show that accuracy remains relatively low, even with enormous Transformer models. Moreover, we find that simply increasing budgets and model parameter counts will be impractical for achieving strong mathematical reasoning if scaling trends continue. While scaling Transformers is automatically solving most other text-based tasks, scaling is not currently solving MATH. To have more traction on mathematical problem solving we will likely need new algorithmic advancements from the broader research community.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
MATHGPT-2 (1.5B)Accuracy6.9Unverified
MATHGPT-2 (0.7B)Accuracy6.4Unverified
MATHGPT-2 (0.3B)Accuracy6.2Unverified
MATHGPT-3 13BAccuracy5.6Unverified
MATHGPT-2 (0.1B)Accuracy5.4Unverified
MATHGPT-3-175B (few-shot)Accuracy5.2Unverified
MATHGPT-3-13B (few-shot)Accuracy3Unverified
MATHGPT-3 2.7BAccuracy2.9Unverified

Reproductions