SOTAVerified

Interrater Disagreement Resolution: A Systematic Procedure to Reach Consensus in Annotation Tasks

2021-04-01EACL (HumEval) 2021Code Available0· sign in to hype

Yvette Oortwijn, Thijs Ossenkoppele, Arianna Betti

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

We present a systematic procedure for interrater disagreement resolution. The procedure is general, but of particular use in multiple-annotator tasks geared towards ground truth construction. We motivate our proposal by arguing that, barring cases in which the researchers’ goal is to elicit different viewpoints, interrater disagreement is a sign of poor quality in the design or the description of a task. Consensus among annotators, we maintain, should be striven for, through a systematic procedure for disagreement resolution such as the one we describe.

Reproductions