SOTAVerified

GreenMachine: Automatic Design of Zero-Cost Proxies for Energy-Efficient NAS

2024-11-22Code Available0· sign in to hype

Gabriel Cortês, Nuno Lourenço, Penousal Machado

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has driven innovations and created new opportunities across various sectors. However, leveraging domain-specific knowledge often requires automated tools to design and configure models effectively. In the case of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), researchers and practitioners usually resort to Neural Architecture Search (NAS) approaches, which are resource- and time-intensive, requiring the training and evaluation of numerous candidate architectures. This raises sustainability concerns, particularly due to the high energy demands involved, creating a paradox: the pursuit of the most effective model can undermine sustainability goals. To mitigate this issue, zero-cost proxies have emerged as a promising alternative. These proxies estimate a model's performance without the need for full training, offering a more efficient approach. This paper addresses the challenges of model evaluation by automatically designing zero-cost proxies to assess DNNs efficiently. Our method begins with a randomly generated set of zero-cost proxies, which are evolved and tested using the NATS-Bench benchmark. We assess the proxies' effectiveness using both randomly sampled and stratified subsets of the search space, ensuring they can differentiate between low- and high-performing networks and enhance generalizability. Results show our method outperforms existing approaches on the stratified sampling strategy, achieving strong correlations with ground truth performance, including a Kendall correlation of 0.89 on CIFAR-10 and 0.77 on CIFAR-100 with NATS-Bench-SSS and a Kendall correlation of 0.78 on CIFAR-10 and 0.71 on CIFAR-100 with NATS-Bench-TSS.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10GreenMachine-3Kendall's Tau0.89Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10GreenMachine-2Kendall's Tau0.83Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10GreenMachine-1Kendall's Tau0.62Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100GreenMachine-1Kendall's Tau0.65Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100GreenMachine-2Kendall's Tau0.77Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100GreenMachine-3Kendall's Tau0.74Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120GreenMachine-2Kendall's Tau0.86Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120GreenMachine-3Kendall's Tau0.79Unverified
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120GreenMachine-1Kendall's Tau0.68Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10GreenMachine-3Kendall's Tau0.39Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10GreenMachine-2Kendall's Tau0.66Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10GreenMachine-1Kendall's Tau0.78Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100GreenMachine-1Kendall's Tau0.71Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100GreenMachine-2Kendall's Tau0.56Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100GreenMachine-3Kendall's Tau0.3Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120GreenMachine-2Kendall's Tau0.56Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120GreenMachine-3Kendall's Tau0.57Unverified
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120GreenMachine-1Kendall's Tau0.64Unverified

Reproductions