SOTAVerified

Gated Convolutional Networks with Hybrid Connectivity for Image Classification

2019-08-26Code Available0· sign in to hype

Chuanguang Yang, Zhulin An, Hui Zhu, Xiaolong Hu, Kun Zhang, Kaiqiang Xu, Chao Li, Yongjun Xu

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

We propose a simple yet effective method to reduce the redundancy of DenseNet by substantially decreasing the number of stacked modules by replacing the original bottleneck by our SMG module, which is augmented by local residual. Furthermore, SMG module is equipped with an efficient two-stage pipeline, which aims to DenseNet-like architectures that need to integrate all previous outputs, i.e., squeezing the incoming informative but redundant features gradually by hierarchical convolutions as a hourglass shape and then exciting it by multi-kernel depthwise convolutions, the output of which would be compact and hold more informative multi-scale features. We further develop a forget and an update gate by introducing the popular attention modules to implement the effective fusion instead of a simple addition between reused and new features. Due to the Hybrid Connectivity (nested combination of global dense and local residual) and Gated mechanisms, we called our network as the HCGNet. Experimental results on CIFAR and ImageNet datasets show that HCGNet is more prominently efficient than DenseNet, and can also significantly outperform state-of-the-art networks with less complexity. Moreover, HCGNet also shows the remarkable interpretability and robustness by network dissection and adversarial defense, respectively. On MS-COCO, HCGNet can consistently learn better features than popular backbones.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
CIFAR-10HCGNet-A3Percentage correct97.86Unverified
CIFAR-10HCGNet-A2Percentage correct97.71Unverified
CIFAR-10HCGNet-A1Percentage correct96.85Unverified
CIFAR-100HCGNet-A3Percentage correct84.04Unverified
CIFAR-100HCGNet-A2Percentage correct83.46Unverified
CIFAR-100HCGNet-A1Percentage correct81.87Unverified
ImageNetHCGNet-CTop 1 Accuracy80.5Unverified
ImageNetHCGNet-BTop 1 Accuracy78.5Unverified

Reproductions