SOTAVerified

From Individual Experience to Collective Evidence: A Reporting-Based Framework for Identifying Systemic Harms

2025-02-12Code Available0· sign in to hype

Jessica Dai, Paula Gradu, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Benjamin Recht

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

When an individual reports a negative interaction with some system, how can their personal experience be contextualized within broader patterns of system behavior? We study the reporting database problem, where individual reports of adverse events arrive sequentially, and are aggregated over time. In this work, our goal is to identify whether there are subgroups--defined by any combination of relevant features--that are disproportionately likely to experience harmful interactions with the system. We formalize this problem as a sequential hypothesis test, and identify conditions on reporting behavior that are sufficient for making inferences about disparities in true rates of harm across subgroups. We show that algorithms for sequential hypothesis tests can be applied to this problem with a standard multiple testing correction. We then demonstrate our method on real-world datasets, including mortgage decisions and vaccine side effects; on each, our method (re-)identifies subgroups known to experience disproportionate harm using only a fraction of the data that was initially used to discover them.

Reproductions