Faster Meta Update Strategy for Noise-Robust Deep Learning
Youjiang Xu, Linchao Zhu, Lu Jiang, Yi Yang
Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.
ReproduceCode
- github.com/youjiangxu/FaMUSOfficialIn papertf★ 28
Abstract
It has been shown that deep neural networks are prone to overfitting on biased training data. Towards addressing this issue, meta-learning employs a meta model for correcting the training bias. Despite the promising performances, super slow training is currently the bottleneck in the meta learning approaches. In this paper, we introduce a novel Faster Meta Update Strategy (FaMUS) to replace the most expensive step in the meta gradient computation with a faster layer-wise approximation. We empirically find that FaMUS yields not only a reasonably accurate but also a low-variance approximation of the meta gradient. We conduct extensive experiments to verify the proposed method on two tasks. We show our method is able to save two-thirds of the training time while still maintaining the comparable or achieving even better generalization performance. In particular, our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance on both synthetic and realistic noisy labels, and obtains promising performance on long-tailed recognition on standard benchmarks.
Tasks
Benchmark Results
| Dataset | Model | Metric | Claimed | Verified | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFAR-100, 40% Symmetric Noise | MentorMix | Percentage correct | 71.3 | — | Unverified |
| CIFAR-100, 40% Symmetric Noise | FaMUS | Percentage correct | 75.91 | — | Unverified |
| CIFAR-100, 60% Symmetric Noise | MentorMix | Percentage correct | 64.6 | — | Unverified |
| CIFAR-10, 40% Symmetric Noise | MentorMix | Percentage correct | 94.2 | — | Unverified |
| CIFAR-10, 40% Symmetric Noise | FaMUS | Percentage correct | 95.37 | — | Unverified |
| CIFAR-10, 60% Symmetric Noise | FaMUS | Percentage correct | 26.42 | — | Unverified |
| CIFAR-10, 60% Symmetric Noise | MentorMix | Percentage correct | 91.3 | — | Unverified |
| mini WebVision 1.0 | FaMUS | Top-1 Accuracy | 79.4 | — | Unverified |
| Red MiniImageNet 20% label noise | FaMUS | Accuracy | 51.42 | — | Unverified |
| Red MiniImageNet 40% label noise | FaMUS | Accuracy | 48.06 | — | Unverified |
| Red MiniImageNet 60% label noise | FaMUS | Accuracy | 45.1 | — | Unverified |
| Red MiniImageNet 80% label noise | FaMUS | Accuracy | 35.5 | — | Unverified |