SOTAVerified

EPE-NAS: Efficient Performance Estimation Without Training for Neural Architecture Search

2021-02-16Code Available1· sign in to hype

Vasco Lopes, Saeid Alirezazadeh, Luís A. Alexandre

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has shown excellent results in designing architectures for computer vision problems. NAS alleviates the need for human-defined settings by automating architecture design and engineering. However, NAS methods tend to be slow, as they require large amounts of GPU computation. This bottleneck is mainly due to the performance estimation strategy, which requires the evaluation of the generated architectures, mainly by training them, to update the sampler method. In this paper, we propose EPE-NAS, an efficient performance estimation strategy, that mitigates the problem of evaluating networks, by scoring untrained networks and creating a correlation with their trained performance. We perform this process by looking at intra and inter-class correlations of an untrained network. We show that EPE-NAS can produce a robust correlation and that by incorporating it into a simple random sampling strategy, we are able to search for competitive networks, without requiring any training, in a matter of seconds using a single GPU. Moreover, EPE-NAS is agnostic to the search method, since it focuses on the evaluation of untrained networks, making it easy to integrate into almost any NAS method.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10EPE-NAS (N=10)Accuracy (Test)92.63Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10EPE-NAS (N=1000)Accuracy (Test)91.31Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10EPE-NAS (N=100)Accuracy (Test)91.59Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10EPE-NAS (N=500)Accuracy (Test)92.27Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100EPE-NAS (N=100)Accuracy (Test)67.19Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100EPE-NAS (N=10)Accuracy (Test)70.1Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100EPE-NAS (N=1000)Accuracy (Test)69.58Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100EPE-NAS (N=500)Accuracy (Test)69.33Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120EPE-NAS (N=500)Accuracy (Test)42.05Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120EPE-NAS (N=100)Accuracy (Test)38.8Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120EPE-NAS (N=1000)Accuracy (Test)41.84Unverified
NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120EPE-NAS (N=10)Accuracy (Test)41.92Unverified

Reproductions