SOTAVerified

Controlling the Amount of Verbatim Copying in Abstractive Summarization

2019-11-23Code Available0· sign in to hype

Kaiqiang Song, Bingqing Wang, Zhe Feng, Liu Ren, Fei Liu

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

An abstract must not change the meaning of the original text. A single most effective way to achieve that is to increase the amount of copying while still allowing for text abstraction. Human editors can usually exercise control over copying, resulting in summaries that are more extractive than abstractive, or vice versa. However, it remains poorly understood whether modern neural abstractive summarizers can provide the same flexibility, i.e., learning from single reference summaries to generate multiple summary hypotheses with varying degrees of copying. In this paper, we present a neural summarization model that, by learning from single human abstracts, can produce a broad spectrum of summaries ranging from purely extractive to highly generative ones. We frame the task of summarization as language modeling and exploit alternative mechanisms to generate summary hypotheses. Our method allows for control over copying during both training and decoding stages of a neural summarization model. Through extensive experiments we illustrate the significance of our proposed method on controlling the amount of verbatim copying and achieve competitive results over strong baselines. Our analysis further reveals interesting and unobvious facts.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
GigaWordControlCopying + BPNormROUGE-139.19Unverified
GigaWordControlCopying + SBWRROUGE-139.08Unverified

Reproductions