Continual Learning Should Move Beyond Incremental Classification
Rupert Mitchell, Antonio Alliegro, Raffaello Camoriano, Dustin Carrión-Ojeda, Antonio Carta, Georgia Chalvatzaki, Nikhil Churamani, Carlo D'Eramo, Samin Hamidi, Robin Hesse, Fabian Hinder, Roshni Ramanna Kamath, Vincenzo Lomonaco, Subarnaduti Paul, Francesca Pistilli, Tinne Tuytelaars, Gido M van de Ven, Kristian Kersting, Simone Schaub-Meyer, Martin Mundt
Unverified — Be the first to reproduce this paper.
ReproduceAbstract
Continual learning (CL) is the sub-field of machine learning concerned with accumulating knowledge in dynamic environments. So far, CL research has mainly focused on incremental classification tasks, where models learn to classify new categories while retaining knowledge of previously learned ones. Here, we argue that maintaining such a focus limits both theoretical development and practical applicability of CL methods. Through a detailed analysis of concrete examples - including multi-target classification, robotics with constrained output spaces, learning in continuous task domains, and higher-level concept memorization - we demonstrate how current CL approaches often fail when applied beyond standard classification. We identify three fundamental challenges: (C1) the nature of continuity in learning problems, (C2) the choice of appropriate spaces and metrics for measuring similarity, and (C3) the role of learning objectives beyond classification. For each challenge, we provide specific recommendations to help move the field forward, including formalizing temporal dynamics through distribution processes, developing principled approaches for continuous task spaces, and incorporating density estimation and generative objectives. In so doing, this position paper aims to broaden the scope of CL research while strengthening its theoretical foundations, making it more applicable to real-world problems.