SOTAVerified

Bridging Multi-Task Learning and Meta-Learning: Towards Efficient Training and Effective Adaptation

2021-06-16Code Available1· sign in to hype

Haoxiang Wang, Han Zhao, Bo Li

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Multi-task learning (MTL) aims to improve the generalization of several related tasks by learning them jointly. As a comparison, in addition to the joint training scheme, modern meta-learning allows unseen tasks with limited labels during the test phase, in the hope of fast adaptation over them. Despite the subtle difference between MTL and meta-learning in the problem formulation, both learning paradigms share the same insight that the shared structure between existing training tasks could lead to better generalization and adaptation. In this paper, we take one important step further to understand the close connection between these two learning paradigms, through both theoretical analysis and empirical investigation. Theoretically, we first demonstrate that MTL shares the same optimization formulation with a class of gradient-based meta-learning (GBML) algorithms. We then prove that for over-parameterized neural networks with sufficient depth, the learned predictive functions of MTL and GBML are close. In particular, this result implies that the predictions given by these two models are similar over the same unseen task. Empirically, we corroborate our theoretical findings by showing that, with proper implementation, MTL is competitive against state-of-the-art GBML algorithms on a set of few-shot image classification benchmarks. Since existing GBML algorithms often involve costly second-order bi-level optimization, our first-order MTL method is an order of magnitude faster on large-scale datasets such as mini-ImageNet. We believe this work could help bridge the gap between these two learning paradigms, and provide a computationally efficient alternative to GBML that also supports fast task adaptation.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
CIFAR-FS 5-way (1-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy69.5Unverified
CIFAR-FS 5-way (5-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy84.1Unverified
FC100 5-way (1-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy42.4Unverified
FC100 5-way (5-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy57.7Unverified
Mini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy59.84Unverified
Mini-Imagenet 5-way (5-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy77.72Unverified
Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy67.11Unverified
Tiered ImageNet 5-way (5-shot)Multi-Task LearningAccuracy83.69Unverified

Reproductions