SOTAVerified

Balanced Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition

2022-07-19CVPR 2022Code Available1· sign in to hype

Jianggang Zhu, Zheng Wang, Jingjing Chen, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, Yu-Gang Jiang

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Real-world data typically follow a long-tailed distribution, where a few majority categories occupy most of the data while most minority categories contain a limited number of samples. Classification models minimizing cross-entropy struggle to represent and classify the tail classes. Although the problem of learning unbiased classifiers has been well studied, methods for representing imbalanced data are under-explored. In this paper, we focus on representation learning for imbalanced data. Recently, supervised contrastive learning has shown promising performance on balanced data recently. However, through our theoretical analysis, we find that for long-tailed data, it fails to form a regular simplex which is an ideal geometric configuration for representation learning. To correct the optimization behavior of SCL and further improve the performance of long-tailed visual recognition, we propose a novel loss for balanced contrastive learning (BCL). Compared with SCL, we have two improvements in BCL: class-averaging, which balances the gradient contribution of negative classes; class-complement, which allows all classes to appear in every mini-batch. The proposed balanced contrastive learning (BCL) method satisfies the condition of forming a regular simplex and assists the optimization of cross-entropy. Equipped with BCL, the proposed two-branch framework can obtain a stronger feature representation and achieve competitive performance on long-tailed benchmark datasets such as CIFAR-10-LT, CIFAR-100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist2018. Our code is available at https://github.com/FlamieZhu/BCL .

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
CIFAR-100-LT (ρ=100)BCL(ResNet-32)Error Rate46.1Unverified
CIFAR-100-LT (ρ=50)BCL(ResNet-32)Error Rate43.4Unverified
CIFAR-10-LT (ρ=10)BCL(ResNet-32)Error Rate8.9Unverified
ImageNet-LTBCL(ResNeXt-50)Top-1 Accuracy57.1Unverified
iNaturalist 2018BCL(ResNet-50)Top-1 Accuracy71.8Unverified

Reproductions