SOTAVerified

Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thought

2023-04-25Code Available1· sign in to hype

Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ben Bogin, Uri Katz, Daniel Deutch, Jonathan Berant

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Modern systems for multi-hop question answering (QA) typically break questions into a sequence of reasoning steps, termed chain-of-thought (CoT), before arriving at a final answer. Often, multiple chains are sampled and aggregated through a voting mechanism over the final answers, but the intermediate steps themselves are discarded. While such approaches improve performance, they do not consider the relations between intermediate steps across chains and do not provide a unified explanation for the predicted answer. We introduce Multi-Chain Reasoning (MCR), an approach which prompts large language models to meta-reason over multiple chains of thought, rather than aggregating their answers. MCR examines different reasoning chains, mixes information between them and selects the most relevant facts in generating an explanation and predicting the answer. MCR outperforms strong baselines on 7 multi-hop QA datasets. Moreover, our analysis reveals that MCR explanations exhibit high quality, enabling humans to verify its answers.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
BamboogleMCR (code-davinci-002) + Google SearchAccuracy66.5Unverified

Reproductions