SOTAVerified

Analyzing and Evaluating Faithfulness in Dialogue Summarization

2022-10-21Code Available1· sign in to hype

Bin Wang, Chen Zhang, Yan Zhang, Yiming Chen, Haizhou Li

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Dialogue summarization is abstractive in nature, making it suffer from factual errors. The factual correctness of summaries has the highest priority before practical applications. Many efforts have been made to improve faithfulness in text summarization. However, there is a lack of systematic study on dialogue summarization systems. In this work, we first perform the fine-grained human analysis on the faithfulness of dialogue summaries and observe that over 35% of generated summaries are faithfully inconsistent respective the source dialogues. Furthermore, we present a new model-level faithfulness evaluation method. It examines generation models with multi-choice questions created by rule-based transformations. Experimental results show that our evaluation schema is a strong proxy for the factual correctness of summarization models. The human-annotated faithfulness samples and the evaluation toolkit are released to facilitate future research toward faithful dialogue summarization.

Tasks

Reproductions