SOTAVerified

Back to the Feature: Classical 3D Features are (Almost) All You Need for 3D Anomaly Detection

2022-03-10Code Available1· sign in to hype

Eliahu Horwitz, Yedid Hoshen

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Despite significant advances in image anomaly detection and segmentation, few methods use 3D information. We utilize a recently introduced 3D anomaly detection dataset to evaluate whether or not using 3D information is a lost opportunity. First, we present a surprising finding: standard color-only methods outperform all current methods that are explicitly designed to exploit 3D information. This is counter-intuitive as even a simple inspection of the dataset shows that color-only methods are insufficient for images containing geometric anomalies. This motivates the question: how can anomaly detection methods effectively use 3D information? We investigate a range of shape representations including hand-crafted and deep-learning-based; we demonstrate that rotation invariance plays the leading role in the performance. We uncover a simple 3D-only method that beats all recent approaches while not using deep learning, external pre-training datasets, or color information. As the 3D-only method cannot detect color and texture anomalies, we combine it with color-based features, significantly outperforming previous state-of-the-art. Our method, dubbed BTF (Back to the Feature) achieves pixel-wise ROCAUC: 99.3% and PRO: 96.4% on MVTec 3D-AD.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
Anomaly-ShapeNet10BTF (FPFH)O-AUROC0.63Unverified
Anomaly-ShapeNet10BTF (Raw)O-AUROC0.5Unverified
Real 3D-ADBTF (Raw)Mean Performance of P. and O. 0.68Unverified
Real 3D-ADBTF (FPFH)Mean Performance of P. and O. 0.58Unverified

Reproductions