SOTAVerified

A Comparative Study on Transformer vs RNN in Speech Applications

2019-09-13Code Available0· sign in to hype

Shigeki Karita, Nanxin Chen, Tomoki Hayashi, Takaaki Hori, Hirofumi Inaguma, Ziyan Jiang, Masao Someki, Nelson Enrique Yalta Soplin, Ryuichi Yamamoto, Xiaofei Wang, Shinji Watanabe, Takenori Yoshimura, Wangyou Zhang

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Sequence-to-sequence models have been widely used in end-to-end speech processing, for example, automatic speech recognition (ASR), speech translation (ST), and text-to-speech (TTS). This paper focuses on an emergent sequence-to-sequence model called Transformer, which achieves state-of-the-art performance in neural machine translation and other natural language processing applications. We undertook intensive studies in which we experimentally compared and analyzed Transformer and conventional recurrent neural networks (RNN) in a total of 15 ASR, one multilingual ASR, one ST, and two TTS benchmarks. Our experiments revealed various training tips and significant performance benefits obtained with Transformer for each task including the surprising superiority of Transformer in 13/15 ASR benchmarks in comparison with RNN. We are preparing to release Kaldi-style reproducible recipes using open source and publicly available datasets for all the ASR, ST, and TTS tasks for the community to succeed our exciting outcomes.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
AISHELL-1CTC/AttWord Error Rate (WER)6.7Unverified
LibriSpeech test-cleanTransformerWord Error Rate (WER)2.6Unverified
LibriSpeech test-otherTransformerWord Error Rate (WER)5.7Unverified

Reproductions