SOTAVerified

Ranking Reasoning LLMs under Test-Time Scaling

2026-03-11Code Available0· sign in to hype

Mohsen Hariri, Michael Hinczewski, Jing Ma, Vipin Chaudhary

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Test-time scaling evaluates reasoning LLMs by sampling multiple outputs per prompt, but ranking models in this regime remains underexplored. We formalize dense benchmark ranking under test-time scaling and introduce Scorio, a library that implements statistical ranking methods such as paired-comparison models, item response theory (IRT) models, voting rules, and graph- and spectral-based methods. Across 20 reasoning models on four Olympiad-style math benchmarks (AIME'24, AIME'25, HMMT'25, and BrUMO'25; up to N=80 trials), most full-trial rankings agree closely with the Bayesian gold standard Bayes_U@80 (mean Kendall's τ_b = 0.93--0.95), and 19--34 methods recover exactly the same ordering. In the single-trial regime, the best methods reach τ_b 0.86. Using greedy decoding as an empirical prior (Bayes_R_0@N) reduces variance at N=1 by 16--52\%, but can bias rankings when greedy and stochastic sampling disagree. These results identify reliable ranking methods for both high- and low-budget test-time scaling. We release Scorio as an open-source library at https://github.com/mohsenhariri/scorio.

Reproductions