To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate. That is the Question: A Case Study on Annotation Subjectivity in Span Prediction
2024-08-05Code Available0· sign in to hype
Kemal Kurniawan, Meladel Mistica, Timothy Baldwin, Jey Han Lau
Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.
ReproduceCode
- github.com/kmkurn/wassa2024Officialnone★ 0
Abstract
This paper explores the task of automatic prediction of text spans in a legal problem description that support a legal area label. We use a corpus of problem descriptions written by laypeople in English that is annotated by practising lawyers. Inherent subjectivity exists in our task because legal area categorisation is a complex task, and lawyers often have different views on a problem, especially in the face of legally-imprecise descriptions of issues. Experiments show that training on majority-voted spans outperforms training on disaggregated ones.